Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6-3 that the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, however, the exclusionary rule was not. The Court specified no redressive measures for those whose rights were violated. The Court would address that in the landmark case Mapp v. Ohio (1961).

This is an excerpt from the article Wolf v. Colorado from the Wikipedia free encyclopedia. A list of authors is available at Wikipedia.
The article Wolf v. Colorado at en.wikipedia.org was accessed 2,734 times in the last 30 days. (as of: 11/08/2013)
Images on Wolf v. Colorado
Preview image:
Original:
Search results from Google and Bing
1
1
1
Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6-3 that, while the Fourth Amendment was not applicable ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_v._Colorado
2
2
2
Wolf v. Colorado | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of ...
The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a number of convictions in which evidence was admitted that would have been inadmissible in a prosecution for violation ...
www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1948/1948_17
3
3
3
Wolf v. Colorado | Casebriefs
The petitioner, Julius Wolf (the “petitioner”) was convicted by a State court of conspiring to commit abortions based upon evidence allegedly obtained in violation ...
www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-saltzburg/searches-and-seizures-of-persons-and-things/wolf-v-colorado-3/
4
>30
4
Wolf v. Colorado :: 338 U.S. 25 (1949) :: Justia U.S. Supreme Court ...
Wolf v. Colorado. Nos. 17 and 18. Argued October 19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. 338 U.S. 25. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/338/25/case.html
5
>30
5
338 U.S. 25, 27 - FindLaw | Cases and Codes
338 U.S. 25. WOLF v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO (two cases). ... the Fourteenth Amendment, solely because evidence that was admitted [ Wolf v.
laws.findlaw.com/us/338/25.html
6
>30
6
Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, L.Ed. 1782 (1949). Martin had a back-alley abortion, which was illegal at the time under Colorado State law.
www.invispress.com/law/justice/wolf.html
7
>30
7
Cortner, Wolf v. Colorado
The Case of the Denver Abortionist: Wolf v. Colorado. On April 25, 1944, the chief investigator for the Denver County District Attorney's office, Ray Humphreys, ...
www.soc.umn.edu/~samaha/cases/wolf%20v%20colorado,%20cortner.htm
8
>30
8
Wolf v. Colorado | United States law case | Encyclopedia Britannica
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wolf v. Colorado (1949) that “security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police—which is at the core of the Fourth  ...
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/646534/Wolf-v-Colorado
9
>30
9
Wolf v. Colorado and Unreasonable Search and Seizure in California
Wolf v. Colorado and Unreasonable Search and. Seizure in California. Robert M. Desky. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/ ...
scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3474&context=californialawreview
10
>30
10
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) - US Civil Liberties
Sep 28, 2012 ... Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)Dr. Wolf stood trial for conspiring with Mildred Cairo to perform an abortion. The prosecution sought to ...
uscivilliberties.org/cases/4714-wolf-v-colorado-338-us-25-1949.html
Search results for "Wolf v. Colorado"
Google: approx. 2.060.000
Wolf v. Colorado in science
Wolf v. Colorado | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of ...
The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a number of convictions in which evidence was admitted that would have been inadmissible in a prosecution for violation ...
Cortner, Wolf v. Colorado
The Case of the Denver Abortionist: Wolf v. Colorado. On April 25, 1944, the chief ... A graduate of the University of Denver and the University of Colorado ...
Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6-3 that, while the Fourth Amendment was not applicable ...
Colorado State University - Pueblo Athletics
February 6, 2015 The Colorado State University-Pueblo women's and men's tennis teams battled a tough NCAA Division I University of Northern Colorado ...
Mapp v. Ohio - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. ... prevented from using the unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial, citing Wolf v.
Football - The Official Site of University of West Georgia Wolves ...
8 Colorado State-Pueblo in the Semifinal round of the NCAA Division II Playoffs this evening at 6:30 ... 12.10.14 | ... NCAA Playoff Preview: Wolves vs. Tuskegee.
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) - US Civil Liberties
Sep 28, 2012 ... Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)Dr. Wolf stood trial for ... Colorado was reversed by Mapp v. ... New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Wolf v. Colorado - Oxford Reference
Wolf v. Colorado. in The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions (2 ... delivers seamless discovery of all Oxford University Press online content.
Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado - Significance, Due Process ...
Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado - Significance, Due Process Represents A Living Principle, Only Exclusion ... New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Wolf v Colorado Case Brief - Case BriefWolf v. ColoradoFacts:Julius ...
View notes - Wolf v Colorado Case Brief from POLI 306J at Stetson. ... exclusionary rule; American Public University; POLS 203; Spring 2012; I am against the ...
Books on the term Wolf v. Colorado
Double Jeopardy: A Reference Guide to the United States ...
David Stewart Rudstein, 2004
Adamson v. California, 1947; Palko v. Connecticut, 1 937; Wolf v. Colorado, 1 949; Twining v. New Jersey, 1 908). The Supreme Court did, however, recognize that due process of law encompassed those rights — whether or not included in ...
Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution
David Andrew Schultz, 2009
810 Wolf v. Colorado views of the affected children were not part of the record; and Douglas, citing the Court's respect for the views of young people in such cases as TINKER V . DES MOINES, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was unwilling to cede full ...
American Constitutional Law: Civil Rights and Liberties
Otis Stephens, Jr., John Scheb, II, 2011
In Weeks v. United States (1914), the Court made this dictum a formal requirement of criminal procedure in federal courts. Writing ... In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment is incorporated within the Due ...
Development of Google searches