Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6-3 that the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, however, the exclusionary rule was not. The Court specified no redressive measures for those whose rights were violated. The Court would address that in the landmark case Mapp v. Ohio (1961).

This is an excerpt from the article Wolf v. Colorado from the Wikipedia free encyclopedia. A list of authors is available at Wikipedia.
The article Wolf v. Colorado at en.wikipedia.org was accessed 1,834 times in the last 30 days. (as of: 06/07/2013)
Images on Wolf v. Colorado
Preview image:
Original:
Search results from Google and Bing
2
1
1
Wolf v. Colorado | The Oyez Project at…
Same-sex Marriage Deep Dive. On March 26 and 27, the Supreme Court heard two landmark same-sex marriage cases. Check out our deep dive on the topic to find out more ...
www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1948/1948_17
4
2
2
Wolf v. Colorado - 338 U.S. 25 (1949) ::…
Syllabus; Case U.S. Supreme Court Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) Wolf v. Colorado. Nos. 17 and 18. Argued October 19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/338/25/case.html
1
>30
3
Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6-3 that the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_v._Colorado
3
>30
4
Wolf v. Colorado | Casebriefs
View this case and other resources at: Bloomberg Law. Citation. 338 U.S. 25, 69 S. Ct. 1359, 93 L. Ed. 1782 (1949). Brief Fact Summary. The petitioner, Julius ...
www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-saltzburg/searches-and-seizures-of-persons-and-things/wolf-v-colorado-3/
5
>30
5
Wolf v. Colorado (United States law case) -- Encyclopedia Britannica
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wolf v. Colorado (1949) that “security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police—which is at the core of the Fourth ...
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/646534/Wolf-v-Colorado
6
>30
6
Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, L.Ed. 1782 (1949). Martin had a back-alley abortion, which was illegal at the time under Colorado State law.
www.invispress.com/law/justice/wolf.html
7
>30
7
Wolf V. Colorado - SlideShare
Feb 1, 2013 ... Project be Zack Stevenson, Savannah Jordan, and Dylan Schmid; Eufaula High School; Washington 3rd period; January 2013.
www.slideshare.net/SavannahJordan01/wolf-v-colorado
8
>30
8
Cortner, Wolf v. Colorado
The Case of the Denver Abortionist: Wolf v. Colorado. On April 25, 1944, the chief investigator for the Denver County District Attorney's office, Ray Humphreys, ...
www.soc.umn.edu/~samaha/cases/wolf%20v%20colorado,%20cortner.htm
9
>30
9
Wolf v. Colorado Case Brief | 4 Law School
Summary of Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25 (1949) Statement of the case: The petitioner contends that evidence gathered and used in his conviction by state ...
www.4lawschool.com/wolf.htm
10
>30
10
WOLF v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO (two cases ...
338 U.S. 25 (69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782). WOLF v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO (two cases). Nos. 17 and 18. Argued: Oct. 19, 1948. Decided: ...
www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/25
Search results for "Wolf v. Colorado"
Google: approx. 2.150.000
Wolf v. Colorado in science
Cortner, Wolf v. Colorado
The Case of the Denver Abortionist: Wolf v. Colorado. On April 25, 1944, the chief ... A graduate of the University of Denver and the University of Colorado ...
Mapp v. Ohio - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University
Cornell University Cornell Law School .... Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 28. This Court has ever since required of federal law officers a strict adherence to that ...
Nevada Wolf Pack vs. Colorado St. Rams at University of Nevada ...
Minnesota Events News, Sports, Weather, Traffic, and the Best of Minnesota.
Mapp v. Ohio - University Press of Kansas
She also analyzes Justice Tom Clark's creative use of Mapp's case to overturn Wolf v. Colorado, which had ruled that the Fourth Amendment's protection against ...
Nevada Wolf Pack Football vs. Colorado State
Sep 9, 2010 ... This intrastate rivalry is with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) and will be played in Las Vegas on Saturday, October 2. The Wolf ...
Colorado State University–Pueblo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CSU-Pueblo is a member of the Colorado State University System (CSU System), along with .... "The thunderwolf was discovered in the Southern Colorado foothills in 1933. ... Michael V. Martin, is the current Chancellor for the CSU System.
University of Colorado Law School - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Wolf Law Building is located in Boulder, Colorado, and is sited on the south side of the University of Colorado at Boulder campus. The law school houses ...
University of Nevada Official Athletic Site - Men's Basketball
The University of Nevada basketball program has announced the date for the 2013 Boys Basketball Summer Team Camp that will be conducted by Wolf Pack ...
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) - American Civil Liberties
Sep 28, 2012 ... Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)Dr. Wolf stood trial for ... Colorado was reversed by Mapp v. ... New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Wolf v. Colorado: Information from Answers.com
Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25 (1949), argued 19 Oct. 1948, decided 27 June 1949 by vote of 6 to 3; Frankfurter for the Court, Douglas and Murphy in dissent.
Books on the term Wolf v. Colorado
Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution
Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution
David A. Schultz, 2009
810 Wolf v. Colorado views of the affected children were not part of the record; and Douglas, citing the Court's respect for the views of young people in such cases as TINKER V . DES MOINES, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was unwilling to cede full ...
ABA Journal - Dec 1968
ABA Journal - Dec 1968
Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961), applied the rule excluding evidence seized in an illegal search, it adopted the view of twenty-six states, but rejected the view of twenty-four states.6 At the same time it overruled Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25 ( 1949), ...
Double Jeopardy: A Reference Guide To The United States Constitution
Double Jeopardy: A Reference Guide To The United States Constitution
David Stewart Rudstein, 2004
Adamson v. California, 1947; Palko v. Connecticut, 1 937; Wolf v. Colorado, 1 949; Twining v. New Jersey, 1 908). The Supreme Court did, however, recognize that due process of law encompassed those rights — whether or not included in ...
Sword And Shield: A Practical Approach to Section 1983 Litigation
Sword And Shield: A Practical Approach to Section 1983 Litigation
Mary M. Ross, Edwin P. Voss, 2006
Colorado When the Court decided Wolf v. Colorado in 1949, it held that the Fourth Amendment applied to the states, but that the exclusionary rule did not. Although the Court in Mupp reversed that part of Wolf refusing to impose the ...
The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment
The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment
Thomas N. McInnis, 2010
United States (1914)lo and the second is Wolf v. Colorado (1949).ll In Weeks v. United ... In Wolf v. Colorado, Justice Felix Frankfurter introduced a very different understanding of the rule when he wrote that the exclusionary rule was not a ...
Development of Google searches


Blog posts on the term
Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf V. Colorado
Project be Zack Stevenson, Savannah Jordan, and Dylan Schmid; Eufaula High School; Washington 3rd period; January 2013.
www.docshut.com/wkmzp/wolf-v-colorado.html
Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) | Personal Blog of Paul Greenberg
Facts: The plaintiff, Julius A. Wolf, was convicted in the District Court of the City and County of Denver of conspiracy to perform criminal abortions.
www.grberg.com/wolf-v-colorado-338-u-s-25-1949/
Wolf v. Colorado Case Brief | 4 Law School
Summary of Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25 (1949) Statement of the case: The petitioner contends that evidence gathered and used in his conviction by state officials was in violation of ...
www.4lawschool.com/wolf.htm
75 years of progressive regression
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." ~ Fourth Amendment
www.renewamerica.com/columns/washington/130414
Spring Semester 2013: Blog for April 29th
Based on our readings and discussions, what are "three" court cases that you found interesting and why?.
masterpteachingap.blogspot.com/2013/04/blog-for-april-29th.html
STATE v. MONTOYA, No. 32,279., May 16, 2013 - NM Supreme Court | FindLaw
Findlaw provides STATE v. MONTOYA, No. 32,279., May 16, 2013 - NM Supreme Court | FindLaw
caselaw.findlaw.com/nm-supreme-court/1631528.html
Washington’s Bizarre Argument on the 4th Amendment » Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Apr 17 2013 Washington’s Bizarre Argument on the 4th Amendment Categories: Civil Liberties, Constitutional law by Ed Brayton When Ellis Washington gets going, reason goes right out the window. In his latest Worldnutdaily column he argues that the 4th Amendment is a crucial bulwark of freedom (which is true) and, simultaneously, that the states should be able to violate it at will without any constitutional limits.
freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2013/04/17/washingtons-bizarre-argument-on-the-4th-amendment/
75 years of progressive regression
A Free Press For A Free People Since 1997
mobile.wnd.com/2013/04/75-years-of-progressive-regression/
H-Net Reviews
www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=12639
HowStuffWorks "10 Overturned Supreme Court Cases"
10 overturned Supreme Court cases are explained in this article from HowStuffWorks. Learn about some of the most famous 10 overturned Supreme Court cases.
www.howstuffworks.com/10-overturned-supreme-court-cases.htm
123